| 1 |
Hi, everyone. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Following my previous RFC wrt version operator problems, I'd like to |
| 4 |
start the second part of the discussion: how to improve version |
| 5 |
operators in a Future EAPI? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I've collected various ideas on operator changes on a wiki page [1]. |
| 8 |
I've tried to stay open-minded and cover every possibility, even though |
| 9 |
I doubt some of them would be even considered. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I should warn you that some of the solutions are interlinked to each |
| 12 |
other, and you probably need to look through the whole page first |
| 13 |
before starting to construct an opinion. For example, specific |
| 14 |
solutions to most of the problems depend on whether we enable version |
| 15 |
ranges and in which form. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I think we should start by loosely discussing the various ideas |
| 18 |
on the wiki page. Feel free to also point out any missing ideas |
| 19 |
or remarks that would be useful there. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
So, what are your comments? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
[1]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Future_EAPI/Version_syntax_changes |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Best regards, |
| 27 |
Michał Górny |
| 28 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives