Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ioannis Aslanidis <aslanidis@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:41:17
Message-Id: ea440b1d0703140838w41e52b83l97444628b21c249c@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran, honestly and without any offense intention, what would be your
2 answers to the questions you formulated? If you ask all that, assuming
3 it's all rethoric, what is your opinion?
4
5 On 3/14/07, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> wrote:
6 > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:02:47 -0100 "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto"
7 > <jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote:
8 > > but it's a Gentoo decision to not accept work credited to XYZ.
9 >
10 > Does this extend to deleting all their previous contributions? Or
11 > refusing to accept updates to their previous contributions? Does this
12 > extend to ignoring security advisories, security patches and critical
13 > bug fix patches published by that person? Does this extend to refusing
14 > to use upstream software that contains code by that person?
15 >
16
17 --
18 Ioannis Aslanidis
19
20 <deathwing00[at]gentoo.org> 0xB9B11F4E
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies