1 |
May I ask you then what is the point of having a /usr/qt/3/bin symlink at all? |
2 |
The idea (as far as I understand) is that the programs are is spearate locations. |
3 |
Expesially the one like qt, which stay in the place they were compiled. |
4 |
|
5 |
On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 22:11:09 +0200 |
6 |
Thomas Weidner <yasea@×××.net> wrote: |
7 |
|
8 |
> What about the following: |
9 |
> instead of heaving /usr/X/Y, /usr/X/Y is a symlink to /usr/Y/X. |
10 |
> so /usr/qt/3/bin whould be a symlink to /usr/bin/qt/3. |
11 |
> the advantage? all binaries/libraries/headers/... are under a common |
12 |
> subdirectory (/usr/bin,/usr/lib,/usr/include) and not spread in /usr. |
13 |
> This could be usable in network environments where |
14 |
> /usr/bin,/usr/share,... are mounted as NFS export. (and it's closer to |
15 |
> the FHS....). |
16 |
> |
17 |
> bye Thomas |
18 |
> |
19 |
> PS: sorry for bad english |
20 |
> PPS: i don't want another filesystem layout flame thread,it's just an |
21 |
> idea.... |
22 |
> |
23 |
> |
24 |
> -- |
25 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Sergey Kuleshov <svyatogor@g.o> |
32 |
Let the Force be with us! |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |