Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing <herd>no-herd</herd>?
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 08:23:09
Message-Id: 4E6B1E38.5010906@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing no-herd? by Mike Gilbert
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 On 10/09/2011 11:15 πμ, Mike Gilbert wrote:
5 > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Markos Chandras
6 > <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
7 >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
8 >>
9 >> On 10/09/2011 11:01 πμ, Michał Górny wrote:
10 >>> Hello,
11 >>>
12 >>> Is there a real reason to have <herd>no-herd</herd>? As I see
13 >>> it, it's just an ugly hack which all programs have to learn and
14 >>> hack for no benefit.
15 >>>
16 >> What is the problem with that? Why is it an ugly hack?
17 >>
18 >
19 > To a simple program/user, it basically says that the package
20 > belongs to a herd called "no-herd", rather than not belonging to
21 > any herd.
22 Well it is pretty obvious that no-herd means errr no herd.
23
24 >
25 > For example, in IRC, willikins tries to look up the members of
26 > "no-herd" when you do !meta -v because the bot lacks a special
27 > exception for this odd-ball value.
28 Just because willikins behaves like that does not justify the removal
29 of this tag. God knows how many utilites and scripts are out there
30 using the no-herd tag from metadata.
31
32 >
33 > I would say that each package needs to have at least one herd or
34 > maintainer (which may be maintainer-needed or maintainer-wanted).
35 >
36 Well, you can easily assign your packages to dozen of herds and still
37 be the only one who touches them. So what's the point? Just to pretend
38 that the package is supported by an entire herd?
39
40 - --
41 Regards,
42 Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
43 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
44 Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
45
46 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOax44AAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCdjMP/3pJ2vV9tkQcwwga+pocB6U8
47 rpIm5nwEKUoTLucVUbyLuF0X8Z3u3RtAF1aJcq0UDN8EhBtzaAPFnvcRekqDF2R2
48 3Col31hyPUFGCXwyij8WSYwoTcVWYLwRw8m8jBBcXQmM2sLXCF1BNZQ83m0IAFv8
49 l73nZkHclebxZ+Pxs6/1nZZ/ZOUHTAT/SaI+pqkDKu64PbEjIKoxhmW5b2vbEPcQ
50 gry3w/lsZsFLNxOM31H4/HkkB4HrOXBH9e8IKTO1dzZIWKWBA3ytwJFf78kWMNDo
51 pz3d++nzw6o0gc0Rr+n2b+qL1gy1FPcM7qzRuZ2kESCvmrMW+HRqIrylSGcToJBt
52 pKP+xF1h6/EJVa1IoQq0IvETms82nPnmV+uRoF5RZDD2gvQ5LIgQCtesHFEDAg8c
53 WyBV1WmGiMg235XQYg8qASfz4VAUuiHqPLtJ/SkyD78CqPNsVf+Ak6t8HLoF+v+d
54 0SJGzC+CbvMJoSXWHcX9pHx1fi3Enw6OziKm1cGzu22TcxCyuMTxGvk9kyfCzT6L
55 QfQ0WQFDS8CO26L/O+uah/boeGYFvNciaEb7m+tQkCEyAIPbNXPFMdz6XzroOStj
56 e5iyj4mpq59MLD/6ULX04mb/4r/3OI3c9f2GfwZOCes+cjTmesMYeHOcMfpiqXIn
57 9Z+DzlydAJ4Xy7iYtIbg
58 =jJ/i
59 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing <herd>no-herd</herd>? "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing <herd>no-herd</herd>? Christoph Mende <angelos@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing <herd>no-herd</herd>? Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>