1 |
On Sunday 28 August 2005 07:28 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 01:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
> > On Saturday 27 August 2005 03:38 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 15:11 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
5 |
> > > > On Saturday 27 August 2005 02:58 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
6 |
> > > > > Which reminds me .. anybody going to scream if I update |
7 |
> > > > > elibtoolize() to be able to check if it was already run, and then |
8 |
> > > > > bug the portage guys to also add it to econf() ? |
9 |
> > > > |
10 |
> > > > do what now ? |
11 |
> > > |
12 |
> > > Make econf handle elibtoolize the same way it does gnuconfig ... |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > why ? this would help us embedded peeps with uclibctoolize, but other |
15 |
> > than that ... maybe i just havent really sat down to figure out what |
16 |
> > elibtoolize does ... |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Because it applies the portage/relink/whatever patches to ltmain.sh |
19 |
> without the need for real libtoolize and the pains that comes with it |
20 |
> and a autoreconf (due to missing macro's, broken build system, etc). |
21 |
|
22 |
i guess if we can clean up the output to not complain when none of the patches |
23 |
are needed ... |
24 |
|
25 |
> Note ... I really don`t think uclibctoolize and the other stuff that was |
26 |
> added is really appropriate in libtool.eclass, as they touch |
27 |
> config.guess, etc .. maybe it would have been better to update gnuconfig |
28 |
> to try and apply the patch if in uclibc profile? |
29 |
|
30 |
uhh, uclibctoolize doesnt touch config.guess ... it only touches |
31 |
ltconfig/configure because libtool does not know about uClibc and thus will |
32 |
often disable shared library support when trying to build on a uClibc host |
33 |
-mike |
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |