1 |
On 20 July 2012 06:28, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Sascha Cunz wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Is there a reason for not using at least en_US.UTF-8 as a "sane" |
5 |
>> default value? |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Because there's no one-size-fits-all locale, but it is specific to |
8 |
> every system so the user must configure it? |
9 |
|
10 |
While this is understandable, the fact remains that not having a |
11 |
UTF-8 locale by default in our stage3 environment is sub-optimal. |
12 |
|
13 |
I understand why the council rejected Debian's C.UTF-8 option, |
14 |
but is there really no better default that we can use? |
15 |
|
16 |
Without any default locale set, in practically all cases that means |
17 |
that the user is presented with English, and mostly the American |
18 |
variant. So, in practice, we are defaulting to en_US, just not in a |
19 |
unicode environment. Correct me if I'm wrong. |
20 |
|
21 |
Also, in most other places (such as our website, GLEPs, ebuilds) |
22 |
we default to en_US.UTF-8. |
23 |
|
24 |
So let's upgrade to en_US.UTF-8, which is for most users more |
25 |
desirable than the current situation. Of course we will still advise |
26 |
them to set their desired locales in /etc/locale.gen. But at least |
27 |
they will start with a unicode environment, as expected anno 2012. |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
> The matter was recently discussed in this mailing list [1] and also in |
31 |
> the March 2012 council meeting [2], and as a result the docs team has |
32 |
> amended the respective section [3] of the handbook. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Ulrich |
35 |
> |
36 |
> [1] <http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_2ffb7ea72e6209439600c371f6fc071d.xml> |
37 |
> [2] <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20120313.txt> |
38 |
> [3] <http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1&chap=8> |
39 |
> |
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
Cheers, |
43 |
|
44 |
Ben | yngwin |
45 |
Gentoo developer |
46 |
Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin |