Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)" <klondike@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] More bugzilla restrictions should be applied to normal users
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 00:42:14
Message-Id: 4DCC7DDB.2010302@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] More bugzilla restrictions should be applied to normal users by "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto"
1 El 13/05/11 01:57, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto escribió:
2 > Hi Markos.
3 >
4 > On 12-05-2011 20:19, Markos Chandras wrote:
5 > > Hi,
6 >
7 > > Quite a lot of users tend to change bugzilla fields without even
8 > > understand why they are doing it. Would it be possible to restrict users
9 > > from touching the following fields?
10 >
11 > > - Importance
12 > > - Severity
13 Never knew if these fields are really used. Anyway I have seen them been
14 resetted a few times and users usually don't touch them then.
15 > > - CCing arches on their own (!)
16 They can still manually add them I think ;)
17 > > - Blocks
18 I at least use that to let users easily report bugs on Hardened docs,
19 and maybe others do too
20 > > - Keywords
21 Yeah this one maybe needs being blocked.
22 > > How do you feel about that? Does bugzilla allow such restrictions?
23 >
24 > I think we should trust our users. Some might feel tempted to "test all
25 > the buttons", but I'm sure the majority will just try to fill a bug
26 > report the best way they know how.
27 > This topic has been raised a few times in the past and as far as I can
28 > recall there never was a consensus about it. In any case, as pointed out
29 > before, some developers want users to be able to CC them on bugs, at
30 > least on some bugs, informed users can have a good idea about the
31 > importance and or severity of a bug and in general being more open can
32 > provide a more inviting environment for users to look at and or
33 > contribute to Gentoo.
34 > Finally, whenever a user abuses bugzilla, you can poke bugzilla admins,
35 > userrel and a few others to look at and take care of it. Some of us can
36 > go as far as locking users accounts - feel free to poke me if that need
37 > ever arises.
38 I'd just like to add that usually a simple warning when users don't do
39 things properly suffices, I recall receiving one from Tommy[D] regarding
40 the use of CCing and after that I didn't do evil deeds with it again.
41
42 klondike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature