| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Jakub Moc schrieb: |
| 5 |
| 28.2.2006, 18:38:10, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
| No, I won't claim that... I'd rather love to know why didn't you point out |
| 8 |
| to an obvious eclass flaw about 30 emails and many hours ago, saving |
| 9 |
us from |
| 10 |
| all the eclass formating, slotting and ewarn blurb. The above needs to be |
| 11 |
| fixed, period. |
| 12 |
| |
| 13 |
| To return to the original topic - focus your QA efforts on real |
| 14 |
issues. Same |
| 15 |
| goes for that non-interactivity stuff. QA that serves no other purpose |
| 16 |
than |
| 17 |
interactivie stuff in the tree (outside of pkg_config() function) _is_ a |
| 18 |
QA problem. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
| inventing problems to enforce an inevitably hackish solution (there's no |
| 21 |
| good one because the needed tools are not available) is not useful at all. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
| Portage is a tool to install and manage packages, and serves no good |
| 24 |
purpose |
| 25 |
| on its own. Crippling installed packages and their available features for |
| 26 |
| the sole purpose of having nice ebuild tree with clean bash code is |
| 27 |
not what |
| 28 |
| QA is for. Improving the whole process is fine and welcome, as long as it |
| 29 |
Wrong. This is exactly what QA is for. There are additional duties for |
| 30 |
the QA team beside clean bash code. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Danny |
| 33 |
- -- |
| 34 |
Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> |
| 35 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project |
| 36 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 37 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
iD8DBQFEBKe7aVNL8NrtU6IRAl75AKCT9h+9V4sM9YxRgIoaD+136dug9ACgkqoI |
| 40 |
chBYTGNn2hEChDAi/WfV1+k= |
| 41 |
=INNg |
| 42 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives