Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Package up for grabs: skencil
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:00:33
Message-Id: 2123105.bH6dYHhr8I@serenity
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Package up for grabs: skencil by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On Friday, September 16, 2016 09:54:42 PM Duncan wrote:
2 > Kristian Fiskerstrand posted on Fri, 16 Sep 2016 14:58:22 +0200 as
3 >
4 > excerpted:
5 > > On 09/16/2016 02:31 PM, Hanno Böck wrote:
6 > >> media-gfx/skencil is a python-written vector graphics tool. It was once
7 > >> popular before inkscape became the de-facto-standard. It hasn't seen
8 > >> any upstream activity for a decade(!), but surprisingly it still seems
9 > >> to work.
10 > >>
11 > >> I haven't used it for many years myself.
12 > >>
13 > >> There are 4 open bugs in bugzilla.
14 > >>
15 > >> Anyone interested in taking it? (else the usual: will be reassigned to
16 > >> maintainer-needed)
17 > >
18 > > Also sounds like a candidate for treecleaning / moving to an overlay and
19 > > not keeping non-upstream maintained things in tree if nobody want to
20 > > take the maintainer burden of it.
21 >
22 > Why treeclean it, if it still works and can still be built against in-
23 > tree python?
24 >
25 > Sometimes mature packages don't get further maintenance because they
26 > "just work" as they are, and don't _need_ to eventually be bloated to
27 > include email and browsing functionality or whatever.
28 >
29 > Of course if it requires old python and eventually the last supported in-
30 > tree python is being removed, and nobody steps up to update it then,
31 > /then/ it should be removed from the tree as it'll be broken /then/, but
32 > that's not the case now, as Hanno explicitly said it still seems to work.
33
34 It needs a maintainer. Are you offering?
35
36 Packages without maintainers anywhere along the line (either local or
37 upstream) risk having security vulnerabilities go unfixed (or even
38 unacknowledged) simply from having nobody who actually cares about the
39 package. Very little "just works", even if it appears to, after a decade or
40 two of little to no modifications or maintenance, if only because hidden
41 assumptions the software makes about its environment cease to hold true.
42
43 So long as it continues to "just work", the work involved in being a proxy
44 maintainer should be next to nil. If it doesn't continue to just work, then at
45 least you have a better idea about what's going on...you might even find
46 effective ways to deal with the problem, either by fixing the package yourself
47 or providing backpressure on the environment changes that have broken (or
48 threaten to break) it.
49
50 --
51 :wq

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Package up for grabs: skencil Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Package up for grabs: skencil Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>