Re: [gentoo-dev] Automatic Bug Assignment

[Kent Fredric]

On 6 February 2016 at 10:10, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote:
> How about, if there's (exactly) one portage-compatible atom
> in the summary and that package has (exactly) one maintainer, we
> auto-assign it? Otherwise, leave it to the bug wranglers.


One of my conceptual misgivings is in practice, there's a lot more to
bug wrangling than that.

In the last 6 months, here are a list of bugs that were never
reassigned from bugwranglers, and were closed due to being invalid,
incomplete, or duplicate.

All of these bugs would be now assigned to the individual bug maintainers.

And I see that as a sizeable quality regression.

https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=IN_PROGRESS&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&chfieldfrom=6m&chfieldto=Now&email1=bug-wranglers%40gentoo.org&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&f0=OP&f1=OP&f3=CP&f4=CP&list_id=3059742&query_format=advanced&resolution=INVALID&resolution=WONTFIX&resolution=DUPLICATE&resolution=WORKSFORME&resolution=CANTFIX&resolution=NEEDINFO



-- 
Kent

KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL