Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-p2p/transmission: transmission-2.12.ebuild
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:41:16
Message-Id: 20110429184036.GC21124@halcy0n.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-p2p/transmission: transmission-2.12.ebuild by Samuli Suominen
1 Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> said:
2 > On 04/29/2011 09:26 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
3 > > "Samuli Suominen (ssuominen)" <ssuominen@g.o> said:
4 > >> ssuominen 11/04/29 18:13:31
5 > >>
6 > >> Removed: transmission-2.12.ebuild
7 > >> Log:
8 > >> drop old, broken with stable libnotify
9 > >>
10 > >> (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha30/cvs/Linux x86_64, RepoMan options: --force)
11 > >
12 > > When removing an ebuild, please do document it in the ChangeLog.
13 > >
14 > > Thanks,
15 > >
16 >
17 > no thanks
18
19 Everytime you do this you make it that much more difficult for someone
20 to track down why a dependency just broke, or why a version they needed
21 went away. You make a changelog entry when you add a version...removing
22 one is just as important.
23
24 This is a policy on the tree that you are needlessly breaking. If you
25 want the policy changed, then go do that. Otherwise, follow the
26 policies that are there for a reason. Contrary to what you may think,
27 you are not special and the rules apply to you as well.
28
29
30 Thanks,
31
32 --
33 Mark Loeser
34 email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org
35 email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com
36 web - http://www.halcy0n.com

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature