Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Experiment: confcache patch for portage-2.0.50-r10
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 17:43:13
Message-Id: 200409101842.48372.stuart@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Experiment: confcache patch for portage-2.0.50-r10 by Paul de Vrieze
1 On Friday 10 September 2004 09:32, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
2 > One question I have is how cache invalidation is handled? Will the cache
3 > not think until the end of time that e.g. kde is installed
4 > in /usr/kde/3.2 while we allready went on to 4.0?
5 >
6 > Paul
7
8 My patch uses the sandbox to see which files GNU configure uses. I maintain a
9 list of those files, and their checksums. At the start of econf, I check the
10 list of checksums. If any of them have changed, I assume the entire cache is
11 invalid.
12
13 Best regards,
14 Stu
15 --
16 Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o
17 Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/
18 http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/
19
20 GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu
21 Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C
22 --

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Experiment: confcache patch for portage-2.0.50-r10 Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>