Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Strange behaviour in portage
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 00:08:54
Message-Id: 20030913020852.4230ca02.degrenier@easyconnect.fr
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Strange behaviour in portage by "Alberto G. Hierro" (by way of Alberto G. Hierro )
1 On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 01:26:10 +0200
2 "Alberto G. Hierro" <fiam@××××××××××.org>(by way of Alberto G. Hierro
3 <fiam@××××××××××.org>) wrote:
4
5 > Why is pfeifer-sources going to be downgraded (i used -U) and why
6 > emerge shows it as an upgrade?
7
8 It's not a downgrade, it's an upgrade in 2.4.20 slot. Your 2.4.21
9 version won't be affected.
10
11 > Is this a bug or is the expected behaviour?
12
13 I would say "minor bug" since it's only about output, or a somehow
14 "expected behavior" since it's now well known :)
15 See bug #18608 for a possible fix to the cosmetic part of this issue,
16 and bug #4698 for a more in depth discussion.
17
18 --
19 TGL.
20
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Strange behaviour in portage "Alberto G. Hierro" <fiam@××××××××××.org>