| 1 |
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:10:18 -0400 |
| 2 |
Jim Ramsay <lack@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
IANAL, but the following line is critical: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> it is essential to do so in order to |
| 7 |
> achieve operability of the Software with another software program, and |
| 8 |
> you have first requested Adobe to provide the information necessary to |
| 9 |
> achieve such operability and Adobe has not made such information |
| 10 |
> available. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Given the situation as you outline it, I think the sub-section above |
| 13 |
expressly permits the binary patch. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
The request has been made, Adobe have not co-operated, that clause has |
| 16 |
been invoked... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
At least, that's how I would read it. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Rob. |
Archives