| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Doug, |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Doug Goldstein schrieb: |
| 7 |
|>>the USE defaults are a bit INSANE... We need to get rid of some of this |
| 8 |
|>>crap... |
| 9 |
Buzzwords like "Stupid,INSANE,crap,bitching" beside: There are projects |
| 10 |
which need these combinations of USE flags like Releng. They are |
| 11 |
currently used to create the GRP set, and I don't see them growing |
| 12 |
useless for us. Further on, the default flags are only a proposal. |
| 13 |
Nobody forces you to use them... |
| 14 |
|>not really a useful endeavor unless we get something like per-package USE |
| 15 |
|>defaults |
| 16 |
or useflag groups and a (even more) flexible profile system. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|>everyone has their own opinion as to what a 'good' or 'sane' default |
| 19 |
is and |
| 20 |
|>debating each flag is a waste of energy |
| 21 |
Full ACK |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
| oh, I also forgot to bitch about "fortran" as the crowd in #-dev pointed |
| 24 |
This has a purpose: There are a lot of packages in the tree which need a |
| 25 |
proper FORTRAN compiler installed (not f2c). Without the default fortran |
| 26 |
USE flag, people who use the GRP wouldn't be able to emerge them w/o |
| 27 |
recompiling gcc. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
As soon as USE based atoms are available, the Scientific Project will |
| 30 |
discuss removing "fortran" from the default USE. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Danny |
| 33 |
- -- |
| 34 |
Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> |
| 35 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project |
| 36 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 37 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
iD8DBQFDr+XOaVNL8NrtU6IRAk/eAJ9TYUeD0n3fR6JnXRfNjddxN5+K9ACfdStW |
| 40 |
nXBlTdx89R6zdkn2wnbSiGU= |
| 41 |
=GwyL |
| 42 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives