| 1 |
Ühel kenal päeval, P, 11.06.2017 kell 10:00, kirjutas William Hubbs: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 01:04:06PM +0100, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 13:28:19 +0200 |
| 4 |
> > Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426262 |
| 7 |
> > > + mv configure.{in,ac} || die |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Looks good. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > -- |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Sergei |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> -1 |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I think this should be handled by the packages, not at the eclass |
| 18 |
> level. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426262#c3 |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> The packages should either mv the configure.in to configure.ac |
| 23 |
> internally, or better yet, the maintainers should ask upstream for |
| 24 |
> their |
| 25 |
> packages to fix it. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
+1, otherwise we will never be able to add/unmask a newer autoconf that |
| 28 |
doesn't look at configure.in anymore, once such a version eventually |
| 29 |
happens. |
Archives