| 1 |
On 11/28/05, Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) <spider@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 17:56 -0800, Bret Towe wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > > |
| 5 |
> > > So, now I'm just asking for comments and/or discussion here.. would it |
| 6 |
> > > be worth the time spent on this? |
| 7 |
> > > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg00436.html |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > looks interesting personally id like to see how it acts on kde also |
| 10 |
> > and some small c++ apps to see if it hurts them any |
| 11 |
> > a single benchmark for a change that would affect so much seems |
| 12 |
> > a bit silly to me |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Yeah, but before I start to spend too much time hacking on this, I'd |
| 15 |
> want to have a suggested metric and performance test setup here. If |
| 16 |
> anyone has ideas for a decent test, I'd be happy. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> As for KDE, I think modern Gnome would benefit as well, since it has |
| 19 |
> been heavily refactioned into libraries these days. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
http://www.gnome.org/~lcolitti/gnome-startup/analysis/ |
| 22 |
you might find this interesting then was posted to lkml a day or 2 ago |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
one think i forgot to comment on is id like to see what kind of speed |
| 25 |
prelink provides also maybe with and without this patch |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives