Archives
Archives
| From: | James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC upgrades, FUD and gentoo documentation | ||
| Date: | Sun, 09 Oct 2011 16:37:13 | ||
| Message-Id: | m3ipnyazro.fsf@jhcloos.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC upgrades, FUD and gentoo documentation by Matt Turner |
||
| 1 | >>>>> "MT" == Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> writes: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | MT> Is that a problem with the ABI, or just that gcc-4.6 is more strict? |
| 4 | MT> I think it's the latter. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | The failure occurs at the linking stage, not the compiling stage. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Ie, ln(1) cannot find some of the symbols it needs if the .so was |
| 9 | compiled with 4.5 and the .o files with 4.6. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Which looks like an ABI issue, yes? |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Again, though, only for some libs. And I do not remember which. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -JimC |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6 |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC upgrades, FUD and gentoo documentation | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC upgrades, FUD and gentoo documentation | "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o> |