| 1 |
Dnia October 29, 2019 9:34:01 AM UTC, Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 2 |
>On 29-10-2019 05:27:37 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 00:24 +0100, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| 4 |
>wrote: |
| 5 |
>> > Hi! |
| 6 |
>> > |
| 7 |
>> > > Today you get chastised for using /space/distfiles-local and not |
| 8 |
>> > > following policy changes. The devmanual states that it's |
| 9 |
>deprecated |
| 10 |
>> > > since at least 2011, and talks of using d.g.o [1]. |
| 11 |
>> > > [1] |
| 12 |
>> > |
| 13 |
>https://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/mirrors/index.html#suitable-download-hosts |
| 14 |
>> > |
| 15 |
>> > Sorry I'm late to the party, but I would like to enquire about what |
| 16 |
>happens |
| 17 |
>> > if a file with existing filename but different b2sum gets uploaded |
| 18 |
>to |
| 19 |
>> > /space/distfiles-local now? |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> The same as before. It gets put in top-level disfiles directory. |
| 22 |
>> Hashes are calculated from filenames, so this wouldn't affect it. |
| 23 |
>That |
| 24 |
>> is, if it put those files in subdirectories in the first place |
| 25 |
>because |
| 26 |
>> it doesn't. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
>/space/distfiles-local is no longer copied to the mirrors? or just not |
| 29 |
>copied in the subdir-hierarchy? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
The latter. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
>> > Doing so and updating the Manifest used to be another (not |
| 35 |
>necessarily |
| 36 |
>> > preferred) method to address upstream remaking release packages. |
| 37 |
>> > |
| 38 |
>> |
| 39 |
>> It's no longer valid. |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
>Just wondering. Do you mean it isn't valid that some upstreams do this |
| 42 |
>(yes horror)? We surely need a way to work around that ... |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
I mean the method using same filename and expecting distfiles-local to overwrite it. It is preferable to just rename it. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
>Thanks, |
| 48 |
>Fabian |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
-- |
| 52 |
Best regards, |
| 53 |
Michał Górny |
Archives