1 |
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:56:00 -0500 |
2 |
Joshua Pollak <pardsbane@××××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
.. |
5 |
> I think PEST would be the best system to use, I just came across it |
6 |
> yesterday when searching for bug tracking software. The reasons I |
7 |
> think its a good option are: |
8 |
> |
9 |
> - Good looking, simple interface, should be easy to use |
10 |
> - Has advanced features so project members should be able to do what |
11 |
> they need. |
12 |
> - Written in PHP so its easy to modify |
13 |
> - Under active development and seems to have a decent sized community, |
14 |
> so its probably not going to go anywhere. |
15 |
|
16 |
I would like to mention Roundup (written in Python, very perty, and |
17 |
very easy to use and setup -- took me 15 minutes and doesn't depend |
18 |
on anything other than mail and python.) |
19 |
|
20 |
Also, I'd like to mention debbugs -- The Debian Bugtracking system. |
21 |
Written in Perl, it has handled over 100k bugs for Debian easily, |
22 |
and is in use in quite a few other projects, incl. FreeRADIUS and |
23 |
others. Also very easy to setup -- took me about 25 minutes and |
24 |
I didn't know what I was doing. Email based but has nice web |
25 |
interface. Also quite easy to use. Check out bugs.debian.org. |
26 |
|
27 |
Given my past experiences with gnats, rt, debbugs, and bugzilla, |
28 |
I'd say bugzilla is *way* too complex for people to use effectively, |
29 |
and has perhaps the most horrid interface I've ever experienced. |
30 |
debbugs was the easiest, and the little bit that I've used roundup |
31 |
makes me feel fairly comfortable in recommending it. |
32 |
|
33 |
In summary, usability is far and away the most important thing |
34 |
in a bug tracking/issue tracking system, and a objective analysis |
35 |
is probably in order. |
36 |
|
37 |
Just my two cents. |
38 |
-- |
39 |
Jon Nelson |
40 |
jnelson@×××××××.net |
41 |
C and Python Programmer |
42 |
Motorcycle Enthusiast |