| 1 |
begin quote |
| 2 |
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 01:32:28 -0700 |
| 3 |
"Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Two possible solutions for this: |
| 6 |
> 1. Have the 'tk' USE flag imply the 'tcl' USE flag. This would cause |
| 7 |
> the'tcl? ( tcl ) tk? ( tk )' example to resolve correctly. |
| 8 |
> 2. the ebuilds doing 'tcl? ( tcl ) tk? ( tk )' are quite clearly |
| 9 |
> wrong, as tk is the graphical toolkit for tcl, ergo they should have |
| 10 |
> 'IUSE="tk"' and that would pull in tcl as wel |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
We have that with gtk and gtk2, and users don't understand it. We are at |
| 14 |
about 1 bug report / week for that due to the nesting (one turn on/off |
| 15 |
and one prefer-gtk2) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I'd still prefer that the python ebuild was fixed to be: |
| 18 |
DEPEND="tcltk? ( X? ( >=dev-lang/tk-8.4 )) " instead of breaking it |
| 19 |
further. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
//Spider |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
begin .signature |
| 29 |
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
| 30 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
| 31 |
end |
Archives