| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 24/04/13 09:10 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 07:32:44PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina |
| 6 |
> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> On 04/24/2013 07:17 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> This would actually be cleaner than a bogus dependency in |
| 10 |
>>> OpenRC. I would probably call it virtual/network-manager |
| 11 |
>>> though. |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>> You can't call it virtual/network-manager, that calls to mind, |
| 14 |
>> you know, net-misc/networkmanager. That's just too confusing |
| 15 |
>> imho. I wouldn't object to virtual/net, or pretty much anything |
| 16 |
>> else that isn't confusing. The net scripts are not a network |
| 17 |
>> manager, networkmanager, wicd, even wpa_supplicant would be |
| 18 |
>> things I would consider to be network managers. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> But the oldnet scripts do run wpa_supplicant, dhcp clients, etc, |
| 21 |
> for each interface they manage. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Newnet doesn't even try that, it just manages static interfaces |
| 24 |
> and assumes that you will use a dhcp client or something like |
| 25 |
> wpa_supplicant in standalone mode to control your interfaces. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
virtual/network-init ? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 32 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlF4iUoACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCvSAEAgSXxzswzYmOfJGl27vtb4C4w |
| 35 |
1RjxSoLzAIAl1htEmr4A/3q3QIghpzNlG0Fmawu3eR8ML6BRf+HWwJplIWhvM6F8 |
| 36 |
=BHp8 |
| 37 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives