| 1 |
I originally sent this to gentoo-user, but it doesn't seem to be getting |
| 2 |
any attention - hopefully that's not a reflection on me :-) |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 19:33, Andrew Ross wrote: |
| 5 |
> One of the golden rules of Bugzilla is "don't submit duplicate bugs", |
| 6 |
> right? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Well, the bug I want to report has already been reported, so any new |
| 9 |
> report filed with be a duplicate and generally piss off the devs (which |
| 10 |
> is fair enough, really). |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> The problems is that the original reporter didn't set the bug's severity |
| 13 |
> properly, and I can't correct it because I'm not "the owner or submitter |
| 14 |
> of the bug, or a sufficiently empowered user". |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> This leaves me in a pickle - I don't want to file a duplicate bug, but I |
| 17 |
> feel that the lack of activity on the bug may be, in part, due to its |
| 18 |
> low severity (it should be blocker, but is rated normal). |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Would it be appropriate to reassign the bug to bug-wranglers and request |
| 21 |
> the severity upgrade? The bug has been open since 2003-08-17 and the |
| 22 |
> only comments are from users reporting similar problems, so I assume the |
| 23 |
> dev isn't interested in working on the problem (or doesn't have the time). |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> The bug in question is #26816 |
| 26 |
> (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26816) |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Cheers |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Andrew |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives