| 1 |
Gnome Herd (although my commit rate is kinda low these days) |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Luca Barbato a écrit : |
| 4 |
> Are we fine? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Mostly, Gnome packages these days tend to be more stable, pushing the |
| 7 |
complexity (and breakages) lower down into the stack (HAL, PolicyKit) |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
The rest of team is steadily adding Gnome 2.20.3 packages to the tree. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
We are somewhat behind on gtk+ mostly due to documentation building |
| 12 |
issues. But nothing major there as it's only a bugfix releases thing. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> What are we going to do: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
For Gnome 2.22, I promised the rest of the team I'd be putting the |
| 17 |
ebuilds into portage earlier. The target is Gnome 2.21.90 which is due |
| 18 |
at the end of January. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
So as we bump our ebuilds for this release, we'll put them in portage |
| 21 |
(hard masked). That should help us unmask Gnome 2.22 much faster. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
We're also waiting for the next stable release of portage so that we can |
| 24 |
fix one of our long standing eclass bugs, which should improve all |
| 25 |
gtk-using ebuilds : https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155993 |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Rémi |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives