Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matthias Schwarzott <zzam@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: adding support for running eautoconf to base.eclass
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:22:10
Message-Id: 200802131322.05913.zzam@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: adding support for running eautoconf to base.eclass by "Petteri Räty"
1 On Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
2 > Fabian Groffen kirjoitti:
3 > > On 13-02-2008 08:50:19 +0100, Rémi Cardona wrote:
4 > >> Petteri Räty a écrit :
5 > >>> What do you think about adding support to base.eclass for running
6 > >>> eautoreconf?
7 > >>
8 > >> In most of the ebuilds where we need to run eautoreconf, we usually
9 > >> apply patches. I can't remember of an ebuild where we just run
10 > >> eautoreconf on its own.
11 > >
12 > > +1
13 > > If you need to run eautoreconf without adding patches, it may be worth
14 > > adding a comment explaining why.
15 >
16 > base.eclass supports the PATCHES variable which is why I use it in the
17 > first place
18 >
19 How can I use PATCHES without quoting issues?
20
21 default is this (when not using relative pathes):
22 PATCHES="${FILESDIR}/p1.diff ${FILESDIR}/p2.diff"
23
24 Regards
25 Matthias
26
27 --
28 Matthias Schwarzott (zzam)
29 --
30 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list

Replies