1 |
Am Samstag, 23. August 2003 07:58 schrieb Marius Mauch: |
2 |
> Well, I've taken that from the existing GLSA format, it is currently |
3 |
> not used by my code. I've no real opinion on that, someone from the |
4 |
> security team (aliz, solar ?) should decide that. |
5 |
|
6 |
I would really like to hear from the security people what they think. |
7 |
|
8 |
> > communication works (Who creates and checks GLSAs, which public |
9 |
> > keys are used, a.s.o.) |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Well, I think that's outside of the scope of this GLEP. |
12 |
|
13 |
ack. |
14 |
|
15 |
> I don't like the idea of GLSAs being used for that, a simple status |
16 |
> update email on gentoo-security should do the job (again, that's |
17 |
> outside the scope of this GLEP). |
18 |
|
19 |
As I understand GLSAs (Gentoo Linux Security Announcements), they should |
20 |
be used to announce security related information. I cannot find a |
21 |
source, where they are defined to deliver fixes in any case. Again, we |
22 |
need information from the Gentoo security experts to make this point |
23 |
clear, I think. |
24 |
|
25 |
> The DTD does not require the <fixed> tag to contain a <version> tag, |
26 |
> so the special value none is not necessary. |
27 |
|
28 |
ok, I see! |
29 |
|
30 |
Karsten |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |