1 |
Le samedi 03 avril 2010 à 12:50 +0300, Petteri Räty a écrit : |
2 |
> I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it just |
3 |
> means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a |
4 |
> different resolution should be used. So what do you think about |
5 |
> disabling later? |
6 |
|
7 |
You are trying to remove a valid status for a case that has been badly |
8 |
managed ??? Speaking for gnome herd, afaik, all bugs marked LATER are |
9 |
for the simple reason they will be done later and no other status would |
10 |
be fine expect REJECTED maybe, but we don't want to say that to the face |
11 |
of the reported like this do we ? |
12 |
|
13 |
-- |
14 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
15 |
Gentoo |