Archives
Archives
| From: | Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds | ||
| Date: | Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:09:44 | ||
| Message-Id: | a46e8aea-ac10-df9a-4074-bf0c6ed1ecb9@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds by "William L. Thomson Jr." |
||
| 1 | On 14/10/16 01:05 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
| 2 | > Problem |
| 3 | > 2. There are binary packages that end in -bin, which is good. However it is |
| 4 | > not clear if that is an upstream 3rd party binary. Or a binary made by |
| 5 | > compiling a large Gentoo package, by a Gentoo dev or contributor on a Gentoo |
| 6 | > system. Like icedtea-bin for example, and likely some others. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Is there a reason that this differentiation would matter? |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds | "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> |