Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:50:33
Message-Id: 53CE33DC.5010700@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps by Martin Vaeth
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 22/07/14 09:39, Martin Vaeth wrote:
5 > Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote:
6 >>
7 >> Maybe this could be solved by having two kinds of revisions: -
8 >> One would rebuild all as usually (for example, -r1...) - The
9 >> other one would only regenerate VDB and wouldn't change the
10 >> installed files (for example, -r1.1)
11 >
12 > I made the same suggestion already on the corresponding bug
13 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=516612#c33 without any
14 > response.
15 Martin,
16
17 I have no arguments against your idea to tell the PM that "this bump
18 only changes dependencies". My initial reaction is that this is a Good
19 Thing. Would you like to try to implement it?
20 - --
21 Alexander
22 bernalex@g.o
23 https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
24 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
25 Version: GnuPG v2
26 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
27
28 iF4EAREIAAYFAlPOM9wACgkQRtClrXBQc7WV1AD+LbojEp7TVY51WobwTflCPzQK
29 wZbmGWiyyBhylG7AgWIBAJRKURylzKxjPWcmjGwllf2CXcublXZCmndzbHeoTm0B
30 =doak
31 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----