| 1 |
On 03/22/2018 12:56 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
| 2 |
> Michael Palimaka schrieb: |
| 3 |
>> I see that in bug #650964[1] Council is pushing forward again with |
| 4 |
>> implementing user whitelisting on this mailing list (ie. anyone that is |
| 5 |
>> not "approved" will have their mail rejected). |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Could someone please explain how this doesn't directly contradict the |
| 8 |
>> core tenets of an open and inclusive community? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> (I do not intend to single out your post, just replying to the thread in |
| 11 |
> general here) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I would like to ask people to stay respectful in their disagreement towards |
| 14 |
> the Council and their decision here. You might not agree with the decision, |
| 15 |
> but the Council is an elected body and was given these powers by the |
| 16 |
> developer community which they represent. Also I have no doubt that Council |
| 17 |
> members who voted for -dev moderation are aware of the counter arguments and |
| 18 |
> honestly expect a net positive effect from this. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> If you dislike mailing list moderation, campaign and/or vote in the next |
| 21 |
> period for candidates who want to reverse this decision. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
+1 for this, and also note that the whitelisting approach allows for |
| 24 |
those opposing to start a project for -dev ML moderation that is similar |
| 25 |
to editbugs and proxy maintenance as we currently have in the project. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 30 |
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 31 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
Archives