| 1 |
On Thursday 10 January 2008, Rémi Cardona wrote: |
| 2 |
> With a quick glance at portage, I found at least those ssh implementations |
| 3 |
> : - openssh |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
none of those are suitable replacements for openssh. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> - ssh |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
non-commercial only, not tested on all arches |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> - ossh |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
only tested on x86, no idea on quality |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> - dropbear |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
only good for embedded systems |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> - ... (probably a few more whose name I couldn't find) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
probably all are just as unworthy |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> This might even be worth a virtual/ssh. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
that would only make sense if the packages were drop-in replacements (which |
| 26 |
they arent) and other packages actually needed to depend on it |
| 27 |
-mike |
Archives