| 1 |
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Chrissy Fullam <musikc@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Wulf C. Krueger wrote: |
| 3 |
> As this change directly affects developers only, please take further |
| 4 |
> discussion to the Gentoo-core ML. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I'd like to, but I appear to have been unsubscribed from that list. |
| 7 |
Assuming that my retirement and this change in policy are not |
| 8 |
unrelated, I'm afraid you appear to have not followed your own policy. |
| 9 |
The new policy reads: "The critical nature of an escalation may be |
| 10 |
determined by the Developer Relations Lead or Infrastructure, for |
| 11 |
security-related issues, that which would endanger Gentoo, or our |
| 12 |
reputation. An issue that is deemed critical does not need further |
| 13 |
justification in addition to stating which of the above situations it |
| 14 |
falls under." In the email you sent kindly sent me informing me of my |
| 15 |
retirement: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> In light of the escalation and review of recent issues, you have had your |
| 18 |
> developer rights revoked for your repeated and aggravated behavior despite |
| 19 |
> numerous attempts to correct that. Gentoo will not tolerate these continued |
| 20 |
> repeat offenses and as such Developer Relations has acted under Developer |
| 21 |
> Policy: |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/policy.xml. Per that policy you have |
| 24 |
> the right to appeal this decision to Gentoo Council. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
You make no mention of the issue being critical, or under which of the |
| 28 |
two criteria I should have been retired under. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Please ask infra to restore my access until such time as you are able |
| 31 |
to follow your own policy for conflict resolution. I'll be waiting for |
| 32 |
a proper bug that I can read that explains what I did to whom, and |
| 33 |
when and how they complained. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Regards, |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Richard Brown |
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives