| 1 |
On Thu, 2020-04-23 at 10:32 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote: |
| 2 |
> I've just discovered dev-perl/Ace has some fun questionable licensing |
| 3 |
> which includes a lovely indemnity clause, which had previously gone |
| 4 |
> unnoticed, and it stipulates additional requests for research |
| 5 |
> publications, which is not something mentioned in any license currently |
| 6 |
> in tree other than Tinker |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Following is the entire body of the license I plan to put in |
| 9 |
> licenses/AcePerl-Indemnity ( name chosen to specifically alert people |
| 10 |
> tempted to accept this license that Indemnification is an important |
| 11 |
> part they should actually read ) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Are you stipulating that people eager to install this package would |
| 15 |
likely go for a dictionary to understand a word they can't even type |
| 16 |
properly on the first attempt? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Best regards, |
| 20 |
Michał Górny |
Archives