Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Victor Ostorga <vostorga@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Wanted: Stats collection (not submission!) testimonials
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:45:11
Message-Id: 20090712104245.2e2a7ade@bit
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Wanted: Stats collection (not submission!) testimonials by Sebastian Pipping
1 On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:25:05 +0200
2 Sebastian Pipping <webmaster@××××××××.org> wrote:
3
4 > Victor, thanks for participating!
5 > Victor Ostorga wrote:
6 > > 1. Local overlays are not taken into account, the output is like
7 > > follows:
8 > >
9 > > Active overlays:
10 > > Names:
11 > > []
12 > > Paths:
13 > > []
14 > > Total: 1
15 > > Known: 0
16 > > Secret: 1
17 >
18 > Does it have a profiles/repo_name file?
19 > Can you share the output of
20 >
21 > # emerge --info --verbose | grep OVERLAY
22 >
23 $ emerge --info --verbose | grep OVERLAY
24 PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
25
26 It is a local overlay which I use to do some tests.
27 >
28 >
29 > > 2. Package mask shows no output (assuming you are taking it
30 > > from /etc/portage/package.keywords) package.mask:
31 > >
32 > > Total: 0
33 > > Known: 0
34 > > Secret: 0
35 >
36 > It's from /etc/portage/package.mask .
37 > Is that non-empty for you?
38 you are right, I dont have that file
39
40 Víctor.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Wanted: Stats collection (not submission!) testimonials Sebastian Pipping <webmaster@××××××××.org>