Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-user.eclass: don't modify existing user by default
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 16:56:24
Message-Id: CAJ0EP41F42KoY9q2aVjs_tePwwnLoJ=NHRP0tpuTghvuAog9ig@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-user.eclass: don't modify existing user by default by Thomas Deutschmann
1 On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:50 AM Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > On 2021-01-04 17:38, Michał Górny wrote:
4 > > You've actually added 'portage' to group 'thomas'.
5 >
6 > Yes, I know that.
7 >
8 > Well, I understand why this might be confusing for you. Like I was using
9 > portage as example for the described example when you give another
10 > service access to a socket like shown in my memcached/redis example.
11
12 That's a really weird example, but if that was your intent please
13 disregard my last message.