| 1 |
Hi there, Goatee author here, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 02:49:45 +0100 |
| 4 |
Sam James <sam@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> # Sam James <sam@g.o> (2022-07-22) |
| 7 |
> # Monolithic mask for dev-haskell/* packages which have no reverse dependencies, |
| 8 |
> # are broken, or severely out of date. The aim is to have the Haskell overlay |
| 9 |
> # (::haskell) be the place for development packages and only have packages |
| 10 |
> # needed for end-user applications in ::gentoo, as the status who has |
| 11 |
> # proven to be unsustainable. More up-to-date versions of these packages |
| 12 |
> # are available in ::haskell. |
| 13 |
> # Removal on 2022-08-22. |
| 14 |
> ... |
| 15 |
> dev-haskell/gtk |
| 16 |
> ... |
| 17 |
> games-board/goatee-gtk |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I am around to fix any issues with goatee* and can proxy-maint |
| 20 |
officially if that will help. It should require little work at the |
| 21 |
moment, since I'm porting to Qt and goatee-gtk isn't getting new |
| 22 |
features. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I do get the burden of maintaining two repos for Haskell though, and I |
| 25 |
have always had a smoother experience using ::haskell than the main |
| 26 |
tree, so I am fine with this move and appreciate the inclusion in the |
| 27 |
main tree in the first place. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
dev-games/goatee can be included in the mask too. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Regards, |
| 32 |
Bryan |
Archives