1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
2 |
Hash: SHA512
|
3 |
|
4 |
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:33:27 -0700
|
5 |
Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote:
|
6 |
|
7 |
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Object or forever hold your peace. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Or argue for 100 posts, either way. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> -A |
14 |
|
15 |
It might be worthwile to prototype this functionality as an
|
16 |
external service.
|
17 |
|
18 |
1. It should be easier to crowdsource the tags definitions, assignments
|
19 |
and QA and therefore helps to build consistent database faster and
|
20 |
easier.
|
21 |
|
22 |
2. decouples tagging from maintaining a package, therefore makes more
|
23 |
community driven and prevents "THAT'S MY PACKAGE, DON'T TOUCH IT YOU
|
24 |
SCHMUCK" type of quarrel.
|
25 |
|
26 |
3. Classic prototyping benefit - might identify problematic areas for
|
27 |
implementation.
|
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
The downside is the implementation might be more time consuming
|
31 |
depending on architecture. Mostly due to 1. I guess but that could be
|
32 |
handled by using git and pull requests for crowdsource and then the
|
33 |
implementation should be basicly no different from using portage
|
34 |
itself, besides using different VCS.
|
35 |
|
36 |
- --
|
37 |
Jan Matějka | Developer
|
38 |
https://gentoo.org | Gentoo Linux
|
39 |
GPG: A33E F5BC A9F6 DAFD 2021 6FB6 3EBF D45B EEB6 CA8B
|
40 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
41 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
|
42 |
|
43 |
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTMTicAAoJEIN+7RD5ejahIlsH/1UmMa1P+QBEZ/HpfOPX1d4Z
|
44 |
S0nYho8vinPQVenOXMY/0KVvh4bzhmrTZWm4itLVB/5taI88m5fzQbvYSNlEn+Nn
|
45 |
zRTcmyuze+3mmDf3++mfzzjmByYLiYJwCdhNF7HH4V04Ph/aEQbjO++9EL37bW/J
|
46 |
uCYs8b0Vtn97utW2mJcUa7Wbgluo6jhCDHW8yGuZW4JfCo6bRQfqqlxGGGufIXK9
|
47 |
N8FX01Kbt2HFqgwdK7uZIfn0Gh9xGkIL2Jk2WCFzUHjZgJTy0UuPGeUSCOsTt7wg
|
48 |
CcETDWrzscuydtdhZaFmtZ3Xs7eQ7I98nwEdlkSdgbsfQFYQlPvomCGZyGehtTo=
|
49 |
=ykWo
|
50 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |