Re: [gentoo-dev] net-im/aim masked for removal

[Donnie Berkholz]

Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> BTW: could be introduce an separate (optional) masking method
> for such proprietary stuff ?
>
> I personally don't want to have such stuff on my system, but I'm
> really too lazy for check each package I intend to install by
> its own.
>
> Would also be cool to have database for those things which is
> easy to query.

I suppose what you want is true enforcement of ACCEPT_LICENSE, in which
you specify acceptable licenses.

Thanks,
Donnie