| 1 |
Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: |
| 2 |
> Calling it "gentoo" makes sense, because the entire tree is what makes |
| 3 |
> gentoo. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Exactly. And the repo already has this name set in repo_name. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> But since it's namespaced in ebuilds/ and because ebuilds/ |
| 9 |
> might have other gentoo-official repos too, then perhaps "gentoo-main" |
| 10 |
> makes more sense. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
If ebuilds/ only has gentoo-official repos then leading "gentoo-" is |
| 13 |
repetitive and redundant, and unlike "gentoo" simply "main" is a |
| 14 |
horrible name. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
//Peter |
Archives