| 1 |
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 04:17:59PM +0100, gentoo-user@××××××××.net wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Kenneth Vestergaard Schmidt wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > Mjello. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Is there any official or unofficial guide about how to submit bugs? I have a |
| 7 |
> > few, but I'm not quite sure what component would be the correct. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Examples: |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > * app-cdr/cdrecord won't emerge, and app-cdr/cdrutils has also superceded it. |
| 12 |
> > Is this 'Ebuilds'? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> cdrecord is deprecated, this is not a bug, but cdrecord is masked. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
'masked'? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> > * evolution depends on libgdkpixbuf, but also depends on it being compiled |
| 19 |
> > with png-support. However, if libpng is not installed when compiling |
| 20 |
> > libgdkpixbuf, evolution will crash at startup. Is this 'Applications' or |
| 21 |
> > 'Ebuilds'? Shouldn't PNG really have a USE-flag? But that would make |
| 22 |
> > evolution having to depend on PNG, which I'm not sure is possible ("not |
| 23 |
> > sure" in the sense that I haven't looked at the possibility of it) |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> This issue is known, although a lot of people have problems with it |
| 26 |
> (at least three people put it up this week) |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Sorry, should have read the archives.. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
> > * dev-lang/jdk and dev-java/blackdown-jdk seems to be alike, except the |
| 31 |
> > latter has a newer timestamp. 'Ebuilds'? |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> jdk is Sun's jdk, blackdown-jdk is Blackdown's version. Use the one you |
| 34 |
> like, they do the same (more or less, there are compatibility issues with |
| 35 |
> each of them). |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Okay.. I thought the blackdown-one was the same as what Sun had to offer. |
| 38 |
Still, shouldn't dev-lang/jdk be moved to dev-java/sun-jdk ? |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
/Kenneth |
Archives