| 1 |
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 03:21, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 25 January 2006 02:23, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> > If there are any hardcoded calls to /usr/bin/sed, it is reasonable for |
| 4 |
> > you to ask for them to be fixed. For any others, use a wrapper script. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I think the wrapper script idea was turned down by someone from portage |
| 7 |
> IIRC. Anyway it's not exactly the cleanest solution: while it would have an |
| 8 |
> immediate effect with no work required, it will increas, and not decrease) |
| 9 |
> the number of "assumption" portage does. I think this is one of the worse |
| 10 |
> things that can be done at this point. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
what kind of "assumptions" ? the kind where we, as ebuild writers, assume the |
| 13 |
system tools have a lot of features ? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
assuming `sed` in Gentoo is a GNU/sed is just fine by me |
| 16 |
-mike |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives