| 1 |
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Yes, but... I think stable keywords on such archs must be used |
| 3 |
> differently, and by virtue of necessity, mean something else than they |
| 4 |
> mean on more mainstream archs. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
This was basically the gist of the Council meeting that discussed this |
| 7 |
issue. The arch is not stable, thus maintainers are not restricted |
| 8 |
from dropping the last stable version. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
The arch team is still welcome to mark things stable if they wish, and |
| 11 |
if they do so it is up to them to work with their users to define what |
| 12 |
this means and (ideally) document it. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
The Council decided not to interfere with the stable keywording, since |
| 15 |
the arch team felt it useful. Maintainers just need not pay it any |
| 16 |
attention. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Rich |
Archives