| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Krzysiek Pawlik wrote: |
| 5 |
> A little introduction: cmake is an alternative for autotools, more and more |
| 6 |
> packages are using it (and some new big ones are on the way, KDE4 for example). |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I've wrote an eclass that makes writing ebuilds for such packages a little |
| 9 |
> easier - it provides an ecmake function that takes care of few needed variables, |
| 10 |
> prefix and such. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I'm a bit confused now. Both this eclass and the recently submitted |
| 13 |
cmake-utils.eclass seem to handle CMake-based packages. Can someone clarify? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Marijn |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
- -- |
| 18 |
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project |
| 19 |
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
| 20 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 21 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) |
| 22 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
iD8DBQFHLdC/p/VmCx0OL2wRAqkvAKCamrr4efE6byCFxKV3+FktlTdEtwCgsXGZ |
| 25 |
k+2A7Ib+BnfNw7wAa+//INg= |
| 26 |
=BV6f |
| 27 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives