| 1 |
On 05/13/14 13:01, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
| 2 |
> f we are trying to consider a majority of users (and thus to |
| 3 |
> select reasonable defaults), from disk usage + decompression |
| 4 |
> overhead point of view it will be the best to store compressed files |
| 5 |
> if they are at least one filesystem block smaller than original |
| 6 |
> file. FS block size may be extracted runtime for any man or doc, or |
| 7 |
> alike directory used, so this is doable. But this approach may |
| 8 |
> overcomplicate implementation. |
| 9 |
The filesystem on which the files will end is totally unknown to |
| 10 |
portage, since it could be a different machine using binpkg |
Archives