| 1 |
At 2005-04-21T13:06:57-0400, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> we've had 'bc' and 'ed' around for historical reasons and because |
| 3 |
> we've never actually tracked what packages invoke 'bc' or 'ed' in |
| 4 |
> their scripts |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> psm has looked into this and found that nothing else in a typical |
| 7 |
> `emerge system` requires these ... that means i'd like to prune them |
| 8 |
> and make package maintainers mention when their package needs these to |
| 9 |
> build/run |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
While you're at it, get rid of nano, too. None of the packages *require* |
| 12 |
it, either. That would save almost 800k! Woo! |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of "human rights"? |
| 16 |
Kusanagi: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action. |
| 17 |
--Ghost in the Shell |
Archives