Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving functionality out of portage and into the tree
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:12:50
Message-Id: 200407310015.59055.jstubbs@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving functionality out of portage and into the tree by Brian Harring
1 On Friday 30 July 2004 09:53, Brian Harring wrote:
2 > For commentary above, I've assumed you're talking about bash
3 > functionality- if you're referring to the scripts in bin/*, we've yet
4 > to bundle those w/ an installed ebuild. Possible I spose, although
5 > again, that falls under another thread/bug; it would be an extension of
6 > portage's env snapshot code, and wouldn't care about where it got the
7 > scripts from, just as long as it could find them :)
8
9 I assumed that, with the moving of most of bin/*, everything would go into one
10 (or more) eclass(es). At least, that seems the most convenient way to me. Do
11 you have a fairly clear view in mind of exactly what would stay and what
12 would be moved yet?
13
14 Regards,
15 Jason Stubbs
16
17 --
18 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies