| 1 |
On 15 September 2014 10:56, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> According to Robin, it's not about rebasing, it's about signing all |
| 4 |
> commits so that messing with the blob (even if it has the same sha-1) |
| 5 |
> will cause signature verification failure. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't a SHA1 attack on the tree object or |
| 9 |
file blobs be completely invisible to the commit SHA1? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
As the Signature only signs content of the commit object, not any of the |
| 12 |
nodes it refers to. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Granted, getting a tree/file object to replicate might be interesting. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Kent |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
*KENTNL* - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL |
Archives