| 1 |
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 03:57:03PM +0200 or thereabouts, Spider wrote: |
| 2 |
> begin quote |
| 3 |
> On Fri, 24 May 2002 07:06:35 +0200 |
| 4 |
> Bjarke S?rensen <bs@××××.dk> wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > Uhm, shouldn't metacity be masked for now? |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Is has some dependancies that are masked. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Well, people who -want- metacity ( you know, you can install it without |
| 11 |
> Gnome2 ) should know what they are after, and to have it masked then |
| 12 |
> would be "not fun", besides, the only reason gtk+ 2 is masked is all the |
| 13 |
> packages in portage that depend on the wrong versions of gtk+ .. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I think that a list of these packages would be very nice so that those |
| 16 |
of us who have nothing better to do could start fixing these ebuild to |
| 17 |
depend on the right versions. Also a "Orphaned Ebuilds" list would be |
| 18 |
nice as well. :) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
__ |
| 21 |
JR Boyens |
| 22 |
jboyens@××××××××.org |
Archives