From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman | ||
Date: | Sat, 19 Mar 2022 07:15:31 | ||
Message-Id: | u5yoae7lp@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman by Zoltan Puskas |
1 | >>>>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2022, Zoltan Puskas wrote: |
2 | |
3 | [Please don't top-post.] |
4 | |
5 | > I've been using both repoman _and_ pkgcheck becasue I was not sure which |
6 | > one covers all the checks I need to make. In fact [Pull Requests |
7 | > wiki](https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:GitHub/Pull_requests) has a |
8 | > big red warning box with the following message, and I quote: |
9 | |
10 | > "CI is not an excuse not to run repoman full, at least for the packages |
11 | > being committed." |
12 | |
13 | That warning box also says: "Furthermore, pkgcheck is imperfect (yet |
14 | very fast) and may fail to notice some subtle breakages (especially if |
15 | USE flag masking/forcing) is involved." |
16 | |
17 | Looks like the warning was added by mgorny in 2016 [1]. Have these |
18 | issues with pkgcheck been fixed in the meantime? |
19 | |
20 | Ulrich |
21 | |
22 | [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?title=Project%3AGitHub%2FPull_requests&type=revision&diff=575482&oldid=575480 |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |