1 |
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:16:54 +0100 |
2 |
Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Tom Wijsman wrote: |
5 |
> > > Anyone who cares about quality will be frustrated by others who |
6 |
> > > do not. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > We have policies to enforce quality, thus frustration is |
9 |
> > optional. :) |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Policies don't enforce quality, people enforce quality. |
12 |
|
13 |
Well, we have policy [1] stating that QA can enforce quality until |
14 |
overridden by a decision by the Council; so, to be fair, there are |
15 |
even more parties involved than just the policy. Which doesn't change |
16 |
the point; we can enforce quality, thus frustration is optional. :) |
17 |
|
18 |
> And doing that is quickly frustrating. |
19 |
|
20 |
There seems to be a lack of frustration in my experience as a QA |
21 |
member; I care about quality by helping people fix breakage, this gives |
22 |
me a feeling of accomplishment instead of a feeling of frustration. |
23 |
|
24 |
> If enforcing quality would be a purely mechanical task there wouldn't |
25 |
> be the same need for people, which would be ideal. But I think we're |
26 |
> some ways away from that still. |
27 |
|
28 |
We have (Auto)RepoMan and it improves as we speak; we are rather quite |
29 |
close to it, making RepoMan warnings fatal is just a step away. Given |
30 |
there is a lack of frustration, why should we do that? It could cause |
31 |
more frustration than what it is trying to fix. Interesting thought... |
32 |
|
33 |
Could we return back to the original subject of this thread? |
34 |
|
35 |
[1]: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:48 |
36 |
|
37 |
"In the event that a developer still insists that a package does |
38 |
not break QA standards, an appeal can be made at the next council |
39 |
meeting. The package should be dealt with per QA's request until |
40 |
such a time that a decision is made by the council." |
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
With kind regards, |
44 |
|
45 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
46 |
Gentoo Developer |
47 |
|
48 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
49 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
50 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |